Angry Issues: Should The Parents Of Obese Children Lose Custody?
Oh boy this is a tough one people!
You’ve probably seen overweight infants and toddlers over the years and thought to yourself, “How could the parents let them get that way?”
Well yesterday the CBS News website reported that a 200 pound 3rd grader has been removed from their parents’ custody. The child – and the parents – are being kept anonymous, but the story has already ignited a firestorm with many people saying that the Cleveland family court overstepped by placing the 8 year old in foster care.. So did the local officials go too far?
On one hand, you always have to place the safety of the child first and foremost. Childhood obesity is no joke and as a leading researcher states – “children with obesity-related conditions like diabetes, breathing difficulties, and liver problems could die by age 30 if no action is taken”.
But whose responsibility are our nation’s children? Is it the parents or the government? At the end of the day we allow children to live in homes full of cigarette smoke, knowing full well that second hand smoke causes illness and potential death. Should these children also be removed and placed in non-smoking foster care? And where do you draw the line? At what weight should a child be considered in danger?
The mother of this particular child says people are trying to make her appear unfit and as though she doesn’t care or love her child. I don’t think that’s true at all. And I think there’s a huge difference between “unfit” and ignorance. The mom goes on to say that she’s working towards a lifestyle change, and the implication is that the mother in question has weight issues of her own. We’ve tackled obesity many times here on the site and as I always argue there’s always so much more going on than simply bad eating habits.
Personally I think this ruling sets a very dangerous precedent. Of course I want to prevent obesity as much as anyone, but I’m not for taking children away from their parents unless their behavior places their kids in actual imminent danger. I certainly would have liked to see an intervention of sorts in this case – but one that helps the family get healthier rather than a punishment. What is placing this child in foster care going to do? How will the mother regain custody of her child? I just can’t see the logic in this ruling or how it’s going to help anyone get their lives back on track.
But what do you think? Should this child have been placed in foster care? Do you think the mother is unfit? And what do you think the solution should be for our nation’s obese children?
| Print article | This entry was posted by Alfonso on November 29, 2011 at 9:05 am, and is filed under ANGRY ISSUES, NEWS. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
























about 1 year ago
I would like to think that the government already had previously tried to intervene in a positive way and has not gotten anywhere. I can’t see a judge going “oh yeah that kid is obese, take them away”…what was done previously would be my question.
about 1 year ago
I’d be willing to bet a hefty sum of money that the kid’s mom won’t be coming in second at the Halle Berry look alike contest (re: Monster’s Ball, where Halle Berry’s character had an overweight son). Obesity runs in families, through genetics, diet and habits learned from the parents.
That being said, I don’t think it’s the right of anyone to remove children from a family unless they are being abused or neglected. Don’t travel down that “if you let the kid get fat, you’re abusing him” road. You don’t know abuse until you’ve seen your Tiger Mom wife forcing algebra into a 6th grader. Some people demand excellence, others are happy to tolerate sloth.
Maybe some people shouldnt’ be allowed to breed. Who’s going to make that call?
about 1 year ago
This is a tough one. I agree with you Alfonso, that taking the child away is going to do anything. I doubt that the family really knows how to feed their family nutritiously. In a lot of homes loves means giving your child what they want and lot of that time it’s food. There should be some sort of intervention like you stated, something to educate the family on what they are actually doing to themselves. They probably need help learning how to food shop, meal plan & cook in a way that is healthy and not filled with processed food. I’ll stop rambling now, but I don’t think the answer is to take the child from the home.
about 1 year ago
I’m not sure whether you guys have a mandatory medical check up in primary schools as well, but in Germany we do have that. They basically check your teeth, height and weight.
I think a neat solution would be to have a mandatory nutrition and cooking class for the families of children who are found out to be obese in those check-ups. In the end, prevention is always better than punishment.
about 1 year ago
Yes, I believe that child should be taken away. 200 lbs. for a 3rd grader? Ridiculous. One doesn’t balloon up to 200 lbs. within 8 short years of life without having SERIOUS maladaptive eating habits. And for that, the parents are negligent… 100%. I don’t go for the “ignorance” excuse.
about 1 year ago
They should absolutely warn the family of the child’s health risks. Maybe they could suggest therapy or a nutrition class. I think the government does not have any right to take a family member away just because of poor eating habits. What about all the psychological trauma this will cause the child being taken away from his family?