food_stamp

Here’s an issue that really pushes my Angry Buttons!

I’ve been in the food market a few times now, standing behind an individual using food stamps to purchase their groceries. Sounds good right? Our tax dollars assisting a family that needs a helping hand is one of the things that makes our country great. But there’s a problem. A big one. Many times I’ve seen those same people using my tax dollars to buy baskets full of garbage food; cake, cookies, donuts, candy, etc.

So when I read a piece in the Huffington Post this week discussing this very issue it got me thinking – should the use of food stamps be regulated so that people can’t buy ‘bad’ foods?

It’s a difficult debate. On one hand, I’m all for helping my fellow citizen out, BUT, I’m not for helping them get to the front of the line for diabetes, cancer, obesity, and other health risks associated with eating highly processed, junk food. People can’t buy cigarettes or alcohol with food stamps, so why should we allow desserts?

There is no candy, cakes, or junk food portion of the food pyramid (now My Plate)  and donuts, muffins and ice cream don’t belong to any particular food group. Personally, I view “treats” as a luxury, and without a doubt, they’re not a necessity. So should we be paying for desserts and fatty meals with taxpayer’s money?

Listen, I’m not that harsh. I think perhaps the best solution is to put a limit on how many ‘bad’ food items can be purchased. Perhaps we can use different stamps for various items, maybe color-code theme for fruits, veggies, meats, dairy, treats, etc and each month, a family or individual receives a certain quota for each group. That would surely be a smart way to regulate the use of food stamps. After all, it would be a shame if kids couldn’t ever enjoy some cookies and milk, or if mom and dad wanted an occasional treat. But in a nation where obesity is rampant, allowing people to fill up their shopping bags with sodas and sugary, fattening, unhealthy food sounds way off to me.

Adding to the argument is the fact that those near the poverty level are the ones most susceptible to obesity and the people who need the most help and guidance when it comes to diet.

I know there’s a ton of political red tape in this issue, but personally I think the old system is defunct. But what do you think? Should we be restricting what and how much people buy if they’re on assistance? Or do you think the program is good as it stands? Comment away…